Attachment 1 COPY October 20, 1948 Dear Doctor Stone: The secrecy with which some of the work of the Atomic Energy Commission has to be conducted creates special conditions for the clinical aspects of its work in that the public is aware of this necessity for secrecy and of the consequent difficulty of probing into it. This situation makes the Advisory Committee on Medical and Biology concerned to a unique degree with the measure of confidence it can place in the judgment of the clinicians and medical scientists who carry on treatment of patients by means of any substances or facilities provided by the A.E.C. I think that I do not misinterpret the opinion of the Advisory Committee in saying that we agree with those who believe the x-ray treatment of arthritic patients you have been giving patients is not justified, and that they do not wish to collaborate in clinical investigations with physicians in whose considered judgment they do not have confidence. When you explain as in your letter to Dr. Warren of July 26 that the selection of patients, the administration of the treatment, and the responsibility for it are not a part of the Atomic Energy Commission's activities, but are activities of the staff members of the University of California Hospital, acting in their capacity as individual doctors, you apparently miss a point to which I would like to draw your attention. They point is that you misunderstood the reasons for our concern. Our view is that we have no right to compromise with fears you have not allayed. This is a matter serious enough in my opinion to justify some further comment. In the first place past experience shows that unfavorable views of new forms of treatment have not always been right merely because they have been conservative. Granted. But on the other hand, there is plenty of experience that shows that some forms of therapy attract enthusiastic supports only to be discarded later as unsafe or unjustified. Neither of these facts relieve the Advisory Committee from the duty of forming an opinion of a procedure that you consider to be the responsibility of the staff members of the University of California Hospital. Very obviously the Advisory Committee on Medicine and Biology has no obligation to do more than decide what the persons it considers to have good clinical judgment as a basis for its recommendations to the A.E.C. If this letter seems to you to go beyond that obligation, please charge is against me personally as unnecessary candor for I would prefer that charge to many other causes for resentment. If you are not quite aware of the fact that your letter of July 26 B&M put you a long way toward losing the Committee confidence I would not feel that I had treated you as I would want to be 1 Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Archives and Records Office Human Radiation Experiments: Records Project 034412 Dr. Robert St. Stone -2- October 20, 1948 treated, if I did not tell you so. If that lone seems to you of minor importance relative to you own freedom to treat patients as you and your colleagues think best, then there is an honest difference of opinion. The Committee would feel, I think, that it is a difference that will prevent such further developments under your direction as depend upon our confidence in your clinical judgment. Under such circumstances you and I could report the situation to Dean Smyth since the University of California Hospital deserves an equally free and informed choice of its course of action. I hope that conclusion on our side as well as yours will be arrived at patiently and carefully with full comprehension of the other's sense of responsibility and of the special circumstances in which this responsibility takes on unusual importance. Yours sincerely, Alan Gregg, M.D., Chairman Advisory Committee on Biology and Medicine U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Archives and Records Office Human Radiation Experiments: Records Project 034413