Attachment 3 United States Government Memorandum To: Charles L. Duncan, M.D. Director Division of Biology and Medicine Headquarters From: A.M. Waggoner, Assistant Manager for Administration Richland Operations Office Subject: Use of Human Volunteers in Biomedical Research RS:RDW Attached is a copy of a letter we received from Dr. W.D. Norwood of the Hanford Occupational Health Foundation (HOHF), our occupational health prime contractor, regarding certain legal aspects of proposed 06 research program entitled "Whole Body Counting". This program, which will be primarily the responsibility of the Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL), involves the use of human volunteers. We understand that PNL and HOHF now contemplate using local college students as paid volunteers and possibly PNL employees in this program. In addition to this program, PNL is planning to initiate a study entitled "Excretion Rates vs. Ling Burdens in Man" in FY 1967. This project also involves the use of human volunteers; in this case PNL plans to use inmates at the Walla Walla State Penitentiary. Initiation of this program is consistent with division of Biology and Medicine (DBM) FY-1967 Program Assumptions transmitted to us March 4, 1965. As you know, DBM is supporting research programs at the University of Washington under Dr. Paulsen (Contract AT(45-1)-1781) and at the Pacific Northwest Research Foundation under Dr. Heller (Contract AT(45-1)-1781), both of which involve the use of human volunteers at penal institutions. Also, the DBM supported research project conducted jointly by Battelle's Radiological Physics and Dr. W.B. Nelp of the University of Washington on (illegible) utilized human subjects at the University's Medical School. Although these projects involve different types of volunteers, we believe that many of the legal questions are common to all of them. Several questions are raised in the letter from Dr. Norwood which require clarification. On the question of licensing requirements it should be noted that HOHF would perform its work in privately owned off-site facilities. We have taken the position that the Contractor would be exempt from licensing, under authority of 10 CFR 30.12, for work performed in its own facilities (in the Kadlec Medical -Dental Building) on the basis that the site is Government "Controlled", i.e., we approve the annual lease and allow the lease payment as a proper item of cost under the HOHF prime contract. However, we request that you assist us by determining if HOHF's activities in Kadlec Hospital (no lease) would remove the Contractor from its exempt status. 1 Our Office of Chief Counsel advises that the use of humans presents several legal problems, especially since we have a direct responsibility under the HOHF cost-type contract. We request your guidance on the questions contained in Dr. Norwood's letter and a statement of DBM policy with regard to these research programs involving human volunteers. Our Counsel's office is contacting John Reich, Assistant General Counsel for Research and Development, on this matter. A copy of their memorandum to Reich is attached. Enclosures: 1. Letter, 3/11/66 Norwood/Waggoner 2. Memo, 3/30/66 Brinck/Reich cc: John Reich, Assistant General Counsel for Research and development, HQ 2