DISCLAIMER The following is a staff memorandum or other working document prepared for the members of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. It should not be construed as representing the final conclusions of fact or interpretation of the issues. All staff memoranda are subject to revision based on further information and analysis. For conclusions and recommendations of the Advisory Committee, readers are advised to consult the Final Report to be published in 1995. MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments FROM: Advisory Committee Staff DATE: June 8, 1995 RE: Documentary Update on Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) Policy on Human Experimentation Attached to this memorandum are three documents, two of which were sent by the Department of Energy's Argonne National Laboratory and one which was retrieved by staff from the National Archives. Attachment 1: Summary Minutes of the January 12, 1951 meeting of Argonne Division of Biological and Medical Research Program Committee states on page 4: As parts of a general discussion concerning the program, it was pointed out that the current investigation of toxicity in human beings is an excellent example of the kind of activity for which a hospital is needed and use for which the Argonne Cancer Hospital is intended. The Argonne Cancer hospital can reasonably be expected to provided the access to clinical material needed by the Division in its cancer investigations and certainly the hospital is the proper place for experiments involving radioactivity in human beings. Concerning the last subject, Mr Marinelli [an Argonne doctor] asked if there is a general policy concerning human experimentation. Dr. McLean [head of the University of Chicago Toxicity Laboratory and AEC RW program] said that the Advisory Committee of the Division of Biology and Medicine of the AEC has been approached several times in the past for a general policy and had refused to formulate one. Apparently, proposals for human experimentation with radioactivity will continue to be judged on an individual basis. In comment, Dr. Robert Schlenker, current chair of Argonne Lab's Director's Ad Hoc Committee on Human Health Research, states that this exchange "implies that experiments proposed by ANL [Argonne Lab] must be reviewed by the AEC." 1 Attachment 2: April 14, 1953 response from H.W. Patt of the Division of Biological and Medical Research at Argonne to J. Vodraska, who apparently had volunteered to serve as an experimental subject, states: We do not conduct experiments on human beings. Moreover, the treatment for radiation sickness referred to in the newspapers is, in my opinion, not practical. Schlenker observes that this document "simply states that ANL does not conduct experiments on human beings. Concurrently, of course, ANL scientists were administering radioisotopes to healthy employees for the purpose of calibrating whole body counters." According to Schlenker, no records have been found relating to these uses of radioactivity. It should be noted that staff has found a number of letters similar to Patt's sent by the AEC in response to unsolicited offers to volunteer for experimentation. Essentially, it is a form letter. Attachment 3: March 14, 1947 memorandum from Dr. A.M. Brues, director of the Argonne Biology Div. to N. Hilberry, Associate Laboratory Director, concerning AEC policy on clinical testing Dr. Brues first quotes from a letter from Stafford Warren, chair of the Interim Medical Advisory Committee: At present clinical testing programs have been authorized as a part of the University of California at Berkeley and the University of Rochester contracts only. In the interim period. . . . it is requested that no other clinical testing be performed by other contractors than has been already authorized. Brues then addresses the status of work being undertaken at Argonne, specifically Dr. Leon Jacobson's arsenic76 tracer studies using human subjects: I have been assuming that this [i.e., the tracer studies] is part of the approved program of this Laboratory and that the responsibility for the patients was clearly in the hands of the University of Chicago, which Dr. Jacobson assures me is satisfied with the program at Billings [Hospital]. 2 In the first place, the University of Chicago has been engaged in work using human subjects and related to the work of the Manhattan Project. As reference to this regard, I can cite report No. CH-3607, which was declassified on the last day of 1946, entitled, "Distribution and Excretion of Plutonium in Two Human Subjects." . . . . [i]t seems to me fortunate that we can parallel our animal observations in humans through the experience and clinical contact of Dr. Jacobson. This work will obviously give us information bearing on the extrapolation of animal work to the human which is most justifiable in the case of this short-lived isotope, which we have good reason to believe may be of actual value to these patients. 3